« The Desi Trifecta in the Spelling Bee | Main | Thank you »

June 05, 2005

Google Stock Split

Normally I take very little interest in commenting on Google since it seems the whole blogosphere is rife with Google coverage.  However this post by John Battelle got my interest (btw John's coverage on the search space is top class and always worth a read)

Will Google split its stock? Given its love of Buffet, probably not, says Bloomberg News. So does that mean smaller investors will be priced out of owning it? Yes and no. Yes, they probably can't own it if if keeps going up - Buffet's stock is at 84K or so - but they can always buy a fund that owns it. In other words, if Google does not split, it'll end up being owned mostly by institutions.

Prices such as Google's make it more difficult for individual, or retail, investors to buy and sell stock, according to David Ikenberry, a finance professor at the University of Illinois in Champaign.

``It's clear that higher sales price equates with higher institutional ownership,'' Ikenberry said in an interview. ``At a certain level, the retail market gets priced out.''

I realize that John is quoting a bloomberg story in which the reporter is in turn quoting a finance professor (David Ikenberry) and my limited dealing with the media has convinced me that words spoken to a reporter don't necessarily turn out the right way in print. 

That being said this statement by the professor makes no sense.  The stock price has no rational bearing on its attractiveness or not (its market cap has but not the stock price).  If you are a retail investor and you wanted to invest $1500 in Google you still can whether the stock price is $10 or $300.  In one case you get 150 shares and in the other 5 but the reality is that you own the same amount of the company.  The only time this stops being true is when the stock price goes so high that it expands beyond the reach of most retail investors (Berkshire at $80,000 comes to mind) but even with Berkshire, you have a Class B stock at $2800.


 

Posted by Venky Ganesan at 11:56 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455928b69e200d8342e971053ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google Stock Split:

Comments

Guys,
Sorry to leave this comment on an unrelated post, but I couldn't locate your email addresses on the site.

I'd like to include your blog in The VC Blog Resource Page on Seeking Alpha. I wondered whether you would send me the info requested at the bottom of the page. This isn't a link-share; no games or tricks. The page is here, instructions for submission are at the bottom:

http://www.seekingalpha.com/2005/05/the_vc_blog_res.html

Best,
David Jackson
editor, Seeking Alpha

Posted by: David Jackson | Jun 29, 2005 9:50:36 AM

from http://www.investopedia.com/articles/01/072501.asp

The first reason is psychology. As the price of a stock gets higher and higher, some investors may feel the price is too high for them to buy, or small investors may feel it is unaffordable. Splitting the stock brings the share price down to a more "attractive" level. The effect here is purely psychological. The actual value of the stock doesn't change one bit, but the lower stock price may affect the way the stock is perceived and therefore entice new investors. Splitting the stock also gives existing shareholders the feeling that they suddenly have more shares than they did before, and of course, if the prices rises, they have more stock to trade.

Another reason, and arguably a more logical one, for splitting a stock is to increase a stock's liquidity, which increases with the stock's number of outstanding shares. You see, when stocks get into the hundreds of dollars per share, very large bid/ask spreads can result (see Why the Bid/Ask Spread Is So Important). A perfect example is Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, which has never had a stock split. At times, Berkshire stock has traded at nearly $100,000 and its bid/ask spread can often be over $1,000. By splitting shares a lower bid/ask spread is often achieved, thereby increasing liquidity.

Posted by: Joey Stamos | Jul 6, 2005 10:57:18 AM

great answer Joey. 100% correct.

Posted by: Vic | Oct 17, 2005 9:30:45 AM

I'm pro-split. Here's an example:

Bill has $1000 that he wants to invest in Google. He can only buy 2 shares at $400 leaving him $200 not invested.

Had Google been trading at $4 a share, Bill could have bought 250 shares leaving no money "uninvested."

At say $10 a trade, Bill would pay commission costing 1.25% of market value of only $800 in Google versus 1.00% market value for $1000 in Google.

Posted by: Jon | Dec 4, 2005 9:12:21 AM

I simply cannot see this stock going on without a split. A few things, some IMHO (disclosure: I own a whopping 3 shares).

1) It's listed on Nasdaq, and a tech stock at that.

2) They publically stated they want to avoid the split, but who on the board actually agrees with that sentiment? The key player is Kordestani, he seems to be the money man among a group of techs and engineers.

3) OT, but someone posted the following on a forum:

10/21/2005 12:30:08 PM
Posted By: agente00 Msg# 1030 of 1227

Chances are Google will probably show a split is coming on its web page before it announces it through some sort of symbolic gesture, just like they did when they used Pi to indicate new issuance of shares...I envision them doing something like putting eggs on the web page....so a 3:1 split will show just three eggs in one basket or maybe some other mathmatical symbolism that relates to division...

Posted by: Dave | Dec 13, 2005 6:38:21 PM

Splits are a waste of time and money at anything less than $1000, IMO.

Low priced stocks increase corporate expenses. Why should a company send $10/year worth of corporate communications to someone holding 1 share of a $100 stock? Not a good use of money and paper, IMO.

If Berkshire's TRUE spread ever gets to 1% during market hours (which I really doubt), that's the fault of the NYSE's system, not of the share price. In fact, BRK-A's quoted spreads are more like 0.1% - 0.2%.

Looking at the data from Friday, May 26, 2006, GOOG's spreads tended to be almost exactly the same as INTC, as well as those for BRK-A. In fact, when INTC's spread is even ONE CENT, it's worse than BRK-A's typical spread of .1-.2%...

Splits exist to make management look good even when it's underperforming, and to give shares an artificial, temporary boost. Let Warren Buffet and Berkshire be your counterexample here.

Posted by: Mike | May 27, 2006 3:48:17 PM

Why split Google...or any other stock? The pie hasn't changed. If the stock goes up after a split, it is purely due to emotional reaction and not related to the underlying value of the stock.

Posted by: Jim | Oct 19, 2007 1:28:37 PM

nasillate heroologist cablelike desirefulness juratory mechanicalness enjoyer soliative
http://www.heavenandearthandyou.com/ >Celebrity Memorabilia
http://www.healyfn.com/

Posted by: Karl Pruitt | Dec 15, 2007 8:30:54 PM

Some great information, I think the they will split eventually. They'll eventually need to being the stock back down to a reasonable price...

Posted by: Hamed Elbarki | May 12, 2008 9:04:44 AM

HAMED ELBARKI, WHO MADE A COMMENT ABOVE IS AN EXCONVICT AND A FRAUD. HIS COMPANY ATI, AVENTURA TRUST INVESTMENTS, IS FAKE. HE CAPTURES OTHERS PEOPLE´S MONEY WITH FAKE DOCUMENTS. MANY PEOPLE ARE LOOKING FOR HIM. HE AND HIS COMPANY OWE MILLION DOLLARS. HIS PARTNERS: GRANT HEMINGWAY AND EIMY ULATE ARE WELL INVOLVED IN ALL HIS FRAUDS.

Posted by: CAROLINA VALLEJO | Nov 20, 2008 2:26:19 PM

thats right the clear that higher sales price equates with higher institutional ownership....

Posted by: no prescription needed | Mar 15, 2009 9:44:30 PM

hey great info about blogsphere... maybe i can do that kind of posts into your blog sometime

Posted by: buy kamagra | Mar 15, 2009 9:45:38 PM

Hamed Ahmed Hamed Elbarki is available in Alexandria Egypt, you can also locate him in Cairo his office address where he is performing his new scam is 8 Road 213 Maadi Degla Cairo Egypt Postal Code 11435 Tel: +20225214150 if you're really serious about your claim you better call interpole immediately to catch him.

Posted by: Informer | Mar 28, 2009 10:03:09 AM

Hamed Ahmed Hamed Elbarki is available in Alexandria Egypt, you can also locate him in Cairo his office address where he is performing his new scam is 8 Road 213 Maadi Degla Cairo Egypt Postal Code 11435 Tel: +20225214150 if you're really serious about your claim you better call interpole immediately to catch him.

Posted by: Informer | Mar 28, 2009 10:03:12 AM

Help is only ever a click away...

Posted by: www.kamagra-kamagra.co.uk | Apr 5, 2009 2:44:04 PM

Even if you have a male impotence problem you can enjoy of plenty satisfying sex, there are already millions of men who have taken over, or controlled their sex life even when they have an erectile dysfunction problem, so look for an answer and have yourself the best solution to an already decaying problem.

Posted by: Generic Viagra | Apr 30, 2009 10:57:04 AM

Wortld's largest OnLine Pharmacy and Health information Website - 1000's of pages of very useful free info and links - The Only OnLinePharmacy with Pharmacies in Each State.
Zenegra, Penegra,
Generic Viagra, Sildenafil Citrate


Posted by: Mens Health | Jul 2, 2009 3:51:58 AM

INFORMANT: THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENT REGARDING ELBARKI.

HAVE A LOOK AT THESE TWO LINKS:

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-22515153.html


http://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/22/nyregion/officer-and-inmates-accused-of-defrauding-other-prisoners.html

Posted by: CAROLINA VALLEJO | Jul 2, 2009 7:13:58 AM

Post a comment